Cambridge IELTS 14 · Academic · Test 2 · Discuss both views

Cambridge IELTS 14 Test 2 Writing Task 2: Sample Answer

The question, a plan, a Band 7.5 sample answer written by IELTS 9, why it scores that band on the 4 criteria, and the mistake most candidates make on this prompt.

Cambridge IELTS 14 Test 2 · Writing Task 2

Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Write at least 250 words. You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Try it yourself first

You learn more by writing your own answer before reading ours. Write it in 40 minutes and get a band for each criterion in about a minute.

Write and score my answer →

Essay plan

  1. Introduce both views and a partial-agreement position
  2. Case for species loss: ecosystems, irreversibility, medicine
  3. Case for other problems: climate, pollution, freshwater, political priorities
  4. Own view: species loss is a symptom of root causes
  5. Conclusion

Band 7.5 sample answer (312 words)

Written by IELTS 9 to the Band 7.5 descriptors, not the book's own answer and not scored by an examiner. Use it for structure and language, then write your own.

Environmental concerns are numerous, and opinions differ over which deserves priority. While some people claim that the disappearance of particular plant and animal species is the defining problem of our era, others believe that more urgent threats exist. I partly agree with the first group, but I think species loss is best understood as a symptom of wider damage.

Those who prioritise extinction have a strong case. Every species plays a role in its ecosystem, and when one vanishes, the effects can spread unpredictably. The decline of bees, for example, endangers the pollination of crops on which millions depend. Extinction is also irreversible: a polluted river can be cleaned over time, but a lost species can never be recovered. In addition, many undiscovered plants may hold the key to future medicines, so each loss narrows humanity's options.

On the other hand, critics argue that issues such as climate change, air and water pollution, and the depletion of freshwater affect far more people directly. Rising temperatures threaten coastal cities with flooding and make harvests less reliable, while toxic air in major urban centres shortens lives every year. Because these problems have immediate human consequences, governments tend to find it easier to justify spending on them than on protecting an obscure insect or orchid.

In my opinion, however, treating these concerns as rivals is misleading. Most species vanish because their habitats are destroyed by deforestation, warming oceans or chemical contamination, which means that tackling those root causes is the most effective way to save wildlife. Conversely, healthy ecosystems absorb carbon and filter water, so protecting biodiversity helps to solve the other problems as well.

In conclusion, although the loss of species is deeply alarming, I do not regard it as the single main environmental problem. It is better seen as an indicator of broader ecological decline, and policies should address the underlying causes together.

Why this answer scores Band 7.5

  • Task Response: Both views are discussed with examples, and the opinion that species loss is a symptom of wider damage is clear and consistent through the conclusion.
  • Coherence and Cohesion: The 'On the other hand' and 'however' transitions frame the debate, and the final paragraph returns to the thesis introduced at the start.
  • Lexical Resource: Environmental vocabulary such as 'pollination', 'habitats', 'biodiversity' and 'ecological decline' is used accurately and not repeated excessively.
  • Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Colon use, passive forms ('are destroyed by'), 'Because' clauses and a relative clause ('on which millions depend') demonstrate controlled variety.

Useful vocabulary

defining problemspread unpredictablyirreversiblecoastal citiestoxic airroot causesprotecting biodiversityecological decline

Common mistake on this question

⚠Many candidates treat the question as a debate where one side must lose, or write generally about pollution without discussing species loss specifically. A strong answer compares the two and explains how they connect.

Write your own answer and get it scored

IELTS 9's AI examiner scores your essay on Task Response, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy, with corrections and an improved version. Your first 2 essay evaluations are free.

Score my essay →

More from Cambridge IELTS 14

Cambridge IELTS is published by Cambridge University Press & Assessment. IELTS 9 is not affiliated with Cambridge. The question is quoted for study and review; the sample answer and notes are our own.

IELTS is a registered trademark of University of Cambridge ESOL, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia. This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to any of these organizations. Scoring tables shown are approximate and may vary by test version.